{"id":3388,"date":"2020-06-30T16:45:04","date_gmt":"2020-06-30T16:45:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=3388"},"modified":"2021-01-17T05:57:13","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T05:57:13","slug":"refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/","title":{"rendered":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Pranjal Sharma | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 30th June 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

SRI BHASKAR DAS VERSUS SMTI. RENU DAS<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

FACTS<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n
  1. This matrimonial appeal arises out of petitioner being aggrieved by the decision made by the District Judge, Dibrugarh dismissing the suit for divorce preferred by the appellant husband.<\/li>
  2. The appellant is a contractual laborer in Brahmaputra Cracker and Polymer Limited, living with his mother, sister and brother in Digboi.<\/li>
  3. He was married to the respondent on 17th<\/sup> of February 2012 and both lived in the matrimonial house of appellant. After a month into their marriage, the respondent wife demanded to reside separately with the appellant husband away from the husband\u2019s relatives in a separate house.<\/li>
  4. As the appellant is a contractual laborer he was not able to sustain separate accommodation for him and his wife and him being unable to accede to the demands made by the respondent wife for separate accommodation led to frequent quarrels between the respondent wife and the appellant husband.<\/li>
  5. Respondent wife continued to resort to frequent quarrels with the appellant and started blaming him for the couple not being able to have a child after marriage even after appellant husband attempted to take the respondent wife to his place of work at Madhuban.<\/li>
  6. As the appellant\u2019s period of contract in connection with his work was about to expire, he brought back the respondent wife to the matrimonial house. However, the respondent wife continued to be indifferent and negligent towards the appellant husband as well as the other family members.<\/li>
  7. In June, 2013, the respondent wife declared that she was not willing to continue her matrimonial life with the appellant and will abstain from wearing \u2018sakha and sindoor\u2019.<\/li>
  8. The respondent wife said the appellant and his family members that she wanted to visit her parental house for a few days but didn\u2019t return back to the matrimonial home thereafter.<\/li>
  9. Instead of returning back to the matrimonial house, defendant wife filed a case under Section 498(A) IPC before Digboi Police Station against the appellant and his family members.<\/li>
  10. The appellant husband and his family members were compelled to apply for pre-arrest bail, the appellant husband further contended that the respondent wife compelled the appellant to execute a written agreement to the effect that the couple will stay in a separate rental house together away from the rest of the family members.<\/li>
  11. The respondent wife contended that she was not provided with food and other medical treatment and that it was her brother who used to take care of the bare necessities of her life and that she was subjected to cruelty to meet illegal demands of dowry in the form of cash and kind by the appellant husband, his step-mother, sister-in-law, brother and sisters from the very threshold of their marriage.<\/li>
  12. The lower court dismissed the suit and rejected the prayer of the husband for decree of divorce<\/li><\/ol>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

    ISSUES<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
    1. Whether respondent (the wife) subjected the petitioner (the respondent) to cruelty and deserted him?<\/li>
    2. Whether the petitioner is entitled to a decree of divorce?<\/li><\/ol>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n
      \n

      JUDGMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n

      The court observed that the appellant and the respondent have remained separately since 30.06.2013, it is evident that there will be no purpose served to keep the marriage alive as there was no matrimonial harmony between the parties to be reached. It was also held that Under the \u201cMaintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007\u201d children shall mandatorily be required to maintain parents and senior citizens, the widowed step-mother of the husband has no personal source of income and the court cannot ignore his statutory duties towards his aged mother, so Case No.230\/2013, under Sections 471\/420 IPC does not stand as it arises out of noncompliance of the agreement of the husband to live separately.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      The court also held that under the custom of Hindu Marriage, a lady who has entered into marriage according to Hindu rituals and customs, her refusal to wear \u2018Sakha and sindoor\u2019 will project her to be unmarried and signify her refusal to accept the marriage with the appellant. Under such circumstances compelling the appellant-husband to continue to be in matrimony with the respondent-wife may be construed to be harassment inflicted by the respondent upon the appellant and his family members.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

      Pranjal Sharma | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 30th June 2020 SRI BHASKAR DAS VERSUS SMTI. RENU DAS FACTS This matrimonial appeal arises out of petitioner being aggrieved by the decision made by the District Judge, Dibrugarh dismissing the suit for divorce preferred by the appellant husband. The appellant is a contractual laborer in Brahmaputra […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":3389,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[28,215,105],"tags":[667,665,666],"yoast_head":"\nRefusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Pranjal Sharma | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 30th June 2020 SRI BHASKAR DAS VERSUS SMTI. RENU DAS FACTS This matrimonial appeal arises out of petitioner being aggrieved by the decision made by the District Judge, Dibrugarh dismissing the suit for divorce preferred by the appellant husband. The appellant is a contractual laborer in Brahmaputra […]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Blog-post-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\"},\"wordCount\":709,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"refusal to wear sindoor\",\"sindoor\",\"sindoor marriage\"],\"articleSection\":[\"High Court Judgement\",\"Landmark Judgement\",\"Law relating to Religion\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\",\"name\":\"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti","og_description":"Pranjal Sharma | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 30th June 2020 SRI BHASKAR DAS VERSUS SMTI. RENU DAS FACTS This matrimonial appeal arises out of petitioner being aggrieved by the decision made by the District Judge, Dibrugarh dismissing the suit for divorce preferred by the appellant husband. The appellant is a contractual laborer in Brahmaputra […]","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/06\/Blog-post-2.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage","datePublished":"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/"},"wordCount":709,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"keywords":["refusal to wear sindoor","sindoor","sindoor marriage"],"articleSection":["High Court Judgement","Landmark Judgement","Law relating to Religion"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/","name":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-06-30T16:45:04+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:57:13+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/refusal-to-wear-sindoor-signifies-a-refusal-to-accept-marriage\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Refusal to wear Sindoor signifies a refusal to accept Marriage"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":194,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3388"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3388"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3388\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7561,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3388\/revisions\/7561"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3389"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3388"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3388"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3388"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}