{"id":3647,"date":"2020-07-10T11:15:06","date_gmt":"2020-07-10T11:15:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=3647"},"modified":"2021-01-17T05:48:13","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T05:48:13","slug":"courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/","title":{"rendered":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Srishti Sneha | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 10th July 2020<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sunitha Krishnan v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others., WRIT PETITION (PIL).No.118 of 2020 (Telangana HC)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Facts and Contentions<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify\">The Petitioner in the present case filed a PIL challenging the decision of the respondents to completely remove the lockdown. It further challenged the government order G.Ms.No 76 General Administration Department 07.06.2020, which permitted the opening of religious places.&nbsp; The Petitioner submitted that the aforementioned act of the government is arbitrary, illegal, and a violation of Article 14, 19, 20, and 300A of the Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify\">Through this Petition, the Petitioner asked the court for the following relief,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol type=\"1\"><li>Direct the State Government to extend the lockdown with the aid of paramilitary forces.<\/li><li>Equip the public health system, provide safety precautions for the entire medical fraternity and pandemic workers.<\/li><li>Open religious places after 15<sup>th<\/sup> July 2020 after reviewing the situation by an expert committee.<\/li><li>To provide interim cash transfer of Rs. 7,500 for all White Ration cardholders which shall help them sustain this month.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify\">The Petitioner contended that the easing of the lockdown restrictions has led to a drastic increase in the number of COVID\u201919 cases. It was also contended that there was no transparency in the media bulletins that were issued by the defendant concerning the tally of cases. The counsel cited various newspapers such as \u201cThe Hindu\u201d and \u201cTimes of India\u201d and pleaded that if there were to be a sudden surge in the number of cases, the medical system would collapse and may result in a dearth of beds in hospitals, and cause hardship to the public.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Observation and Judgement<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify\">The court observed that while dealing with petitions under Article 226 which deals with the extraordinary jurisdiction of the court, its jurisdiction is limited when it comes to interfering with the State\u2019s policy decisions. It further stated that, while relaxing the lockdown the State must have taken various factors into account such as the livelihood of the worker class, economic restrictions, movement restrictions, etc. Moreover, it also stated that the public is under no obligation to visit religious places or any other public place. Furthermore, the government also issues health bulletins cautioning people about the dos and don\u2019ts to follow during the pandemic. The court further observed that the policymaking is the executive\u2019s domain and it shall not interfere with it unless such decisions are made with \u201cmalafide, or in gross abuse of power\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-text-align-justify\">Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions. If it does so it may transgress into the areas that are earmarked for the executives which shall violate the theory of separation of powers incorporated in the Constitution. Therefore, the Court refused to allow the relief sought by the petitioners as it would amount to \u201cdirecting the Executive in a matter of policy.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Srishti Sneha | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 10th July 2020 Sunitha Krishnan v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others., WRIT PETITION (PIL).No.118 of 2020 (Telangana HC) Facts and Contentions The Petitioner in the present case filed a PIL challenging the decision of the respondents to completely remove [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":3648,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[101,28,68],"tags":[807],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/hc-hyd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1200\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\"},\"wordCount\":517,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"keywords\":[\"the courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either fundamental rights or any provision of law\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Constitutional Law\",\"High Court Judgement\",\"Important Cases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\",\"name\":\"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti","description":"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti","og_description":"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1200,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/hc-hyd.jpg?fit=1200%2C675&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law","datePublished":"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/"},"wordCount":517,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"keywords":["the courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either fundamental rights or any provision of law"],"articleSection":["Constitutional Law","High Court Judgement","Important Cases"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/","name":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-07-10T11:15:06+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:48:13+00:00","description":"Thus, the court held that as long as the policy decision does not infringe the fundamental rights or any other provision of law, the court shall be wary of interfering with such decisions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-would-not-interfere-with-a-policy-decision-unless-there-is-a-violation-of-either-fundamental-rights-or-any-provision-of-law\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Courts would not interfere with a policy decision unless there is a violation of either Fundamental Rights or any provision of Law"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":150,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3647"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3647"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3647\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7510,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3647\/revisions\/7510"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}