{"id":434,"date":"2020-04-23T10:29:53","date_gmt":"2020-04-23T10:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=434"},"modified":"2021-01-17T11:54:28","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T11:54:28","slug":"divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong> Kritika Pandey | Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda | 28th December 2019 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar Vs State of Maharashtra &#038; ors. Criminal Writ Petition No.2546 of 2016 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>FACTS:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The parties to the Petition married on 6.5.1980\nwhereas the Petitioner was divorced by the Respondent under section 13 of the\nHindu Marriage Act, 1956 on 27.4.2000 on the ground of adultery.<\/li><li>In the aforesaid background, the Petitioner-wife moved\nan application for enhancement of maintenance from Rs.150\/- and Rs.25\/- to the\nson which was allowed by the impugned order dated 12.8.2010.The learned\nMagistrate enhanced the maintenance amount to Rs.500\/- and Rs.400\/- to the wife\nand son respectively.<\/li><li>Whereas, the Application for cancellation of the maintenance\nmoved by the husband, pursuant to the provisions of Sub-section (4) of Section\n125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 came to be rejected. As such, the\nhusband preferred a Criminal Revision Application No.204 of 2010. <\/li><li>The aforesaid Revision came to be allowed by the\nlearned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli. <\/li><li>The Magistrate, rejected the application for\ncancellation of maintenance amount.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>PETITIONER CONTENTION:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Learned counsel for the Petitioner-wife would urge\nthat, even if the Petitioner is a divorcee, having regard to the provisions of\nSub-section (4) of Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 she is\nentitled for maintenance as she continues, to be a woman, within the meaning of\nSub-section (4) of Section 125 of the Act.<\/li><li>He would draw support from the Judgments of the Apex\nCourt in VANAMALA VS H.M.RANGANATHA BHATTA reported in 1995 DGLS (SC) 722 and\nROHTAS SINGH VS RAMENDRI reported in 2000 DGLS (SC) 450 so as to support his\naforesaid contentions. The sum and substance of the submission is even if there\nis a decree of divorce passed on the allegation of adultery, still bar under\nSub-section (4) of Section 125 of the Act, will not be attracted, as even after\ndivorce, she ceases to have the status of a wife but, she continues to be a\nwoman.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>RESPONDENT CONTENTION:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The learned counsel for the Respondent submits that\nthe divorce proceedings initiated by the Respondent-husband came to be allowed,\nas the allegation of adultery was proved against the Petitioner-wife. <\/li><li>According to him, in view of the statutory embargo\nunder Sub-section (4) of Section 125 of the Act, the Court below has rightly\nheld that the Petitioner is not entitled for maintenance.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>HELD:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Learned counsel for the Petitioner has tried to rely\non the judgments of the Apex Court in VANAMALA and ROHTAS SINGH supra so as to\nclaim the status of the Petitioner-wife as that of a woman continues, in spite\nof the divorce.<\/li><li>The fact remains that, there is an expressed embargo\non the right of a woman to claim maintenance, pursuant to the provisions under\nSub-section (4) of section 125 of the Act. If the allegation of adultery are\nproved against such a women or in spite of the husband being ready to maintain\nher and she refuses to cohabit the women\/wife can be refused payment of maintenance.<\/li><li>As far as factual matrix of the aforesaid case, namely\nVANAMALA and ROHTASH SINGH is concerned, both these cases are based on\nidentifying and recognizing the right of a woman who was divorced not on the\nground of proved adultery.<\/li><li>\u00a0In the\naforesaid background, both these Judgments will be hardly of any assistance to\nthe Petitioner.<\/li><li>Considering the expressed embargo on the right of the\nPetitioner, to claim maintenance\u00a0 based\non the allegation of adultery, the Court below has rightly held that the Petitioner-wife\nis not entitled for maintenance.<\/li><li>Dismissed.<\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kritika Pandey | Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda | 28th December 2019 Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar Vs State of Maharashtra &#038; ors. Criminal Writ Petition No.2546 of 2016 FACTS: The parties to the Petition married on 6.5.1980 whereas the Petitioner was divorced by the Respondent under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 on 27.4.2000 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":435,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[85,28,68],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Kritika Pandey | Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda | 28th December 2019 Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar Vs State of Maharashtra &#038; ors. Criminal Writ Petition No.2546 of 2016 FACTS: The parties to the Petition married on 6.5.1980 whereas the Petitioner was divorced by the Respondent under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 on 27.4.2000 [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bombay-high-court-renamed-to-mumbai-high-court-1-1.jpg?fit=400%2C225&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"225\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\"},\"wordCount\":586,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Family Law\",\"High Court Judgement\",\"Important Cases\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\",\"name\":\"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti","og_description":"Kritika Pandey | Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda | 28th December 2019 Sanjivani Ramchandra Kondalkar Vs State of Maharashtra &#038; ors. Criminal Writ Petition No.2546 of 2016 FACTS: The parties to the Petition married on 6.5.1980 whereas the Petitioner was divorced by the Respondent under section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 on 27.4.2000 [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00","og_image":[{"width":400,"height":225,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/bombay-high-court-renamed-to-mumbai-high-court-1-1.jpg?fit=400%2C225&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court","datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/"},"wordCount":586,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Family Law","High Court Judgement","Important Cases"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/","name":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:54:28+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/divorced-on-ground-of-adultery-then-wife-is-not-entitled-for-maintenance-bombay-high-court\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Divorced on Ground of Adultery then, Wife is not entitled for Maintenance: Bombay High Court"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":183,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=434"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8029,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/434\/revisions\/8029"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/435"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}