{"id":439,"date":"2020-04-23T10:29:53","date_gmt":"2020-04-23T10:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=439"},"modified":"2021-01-17T11:52:11","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T11:52:11","slug":"retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","title":{"rendered":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong> Aashray Chaudhary | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 29th December 2019 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Management\nof the Banara Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Society Ltd. v. Workman\nPratap Singh <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Facts<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The\nrespondent here worked as a Peon in the appellant Cooperative marketing\nsociety. The appellant terminated his services and aggrieved by the termination\nthe respondent made a reference through the State to the Labour Court to decide\nthe legality and correctness of his termination order. The labour Court held\nthe termination as bad in law and accordingly awarded lump sum compensation to\nthe respondent in lieu of reinstatement in service, which respondent accepted.<\/li><li>After\na few years the respondent filed a representation to the appellant asking for\nre-employment in terms of Section 25(H)<a href=\"#_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> of\nthe Industrial Disputes Act (hereinafter referred as \u201cthe act\u201d) as the\nappellant had regularised the services of two peons between this period of\ntime. <\/li><li>On\nthe refusal of appellant the respondent made an industrial reference to the\nLabour Court. The Labour Court answered in favour of the appellant. After which\nthe respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court, which ordered for\nre-employment of the respondent. Aggrieved by the order the Appellant filed an\nappeal before the Division Bench on dismissal of which he filed the present\nappeal before the Apex Court.<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Issue<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Whether\nthe respondent was entitled to claim re-employment in the appellant\u2019s services?<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What\nwas held?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The\nCourt allowed the appeal and held that the respondent was not entitled to seek\nre-employment under section 25(H) of the act.<\/li><li>The\nCourt based its ruling on two reasons. Firstly, the fact that the respondent\nhad accepted the compensation awarded by the labour Court in lieu of his right\nto reinstatement in service and secondly that Section 25(H) has no application\nin this case.<\/li><li>The\ncourt was of the opinion that in order to attract the provision of section\n25(H) of the act, it must be proved by the workman that firstly, he was\n\u201cretrenched employee\u201d and secondly his ex-employer has decided to fill up\nvacancies in their set up and therefore he is entitled to claim preference over\nany other persons while seeking re-employment in the services.<\/li><li>The\npresent case was not of retrenchment as the respondent had accepted the\ncompensation awarded by the labour court in lieu of his right of reinstatement.\nIt was also observed that as no fresh employment was being offered in this\ncase, the appellant merely regularised the services of an employee already in\nservice. In which case there is no question of re-employment opportunity under\nsection 25(H).<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Section\n25(H) provides for re-employment of retrenched workman. Basically it says that\nwhen an employer retrenches some of its workforce, the next time he is looking\nfor workmen he should consider the ones retrenched first.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Aashray Chaudhary | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 29th December 2019 Management of the Banara Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Society Ltd. v. Workman Pratap Singh Facts The respondent here worked as a Peon in the appellant Cooperative marketing society. The appellant terminated his services and aggrieved by the termination the respondent made a reference through the State [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Aashray Chaudhary | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 29th December 2019 Management of the Banara Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Society Ltd. v. Workman Pratap Singh Facts The respondent here worked as a Peon in the appellant Cooperative marketing society. The appellant terminated his services and aggrieved by the termination the respondent made a reference through the State [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"315\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\"},\"wordCount\":474,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court Judgement\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\",\"name\":\"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti","og_description":"Aashray Chaudhary | Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad | 29th December 2019 Management of the Banara Cooperative Marketing-cum-Processing Society Ltd. v. Workman Pratap Singh Facts The respondent here worked as a Peon in the appellant Cooperative marketing society. The appellant terminated his services and aggrieved by the termination the respondent made a reference through the State [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":560,"height":315,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947","datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/"},"wordCount":474,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court Judgement"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/","name":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:53+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:52:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/retrenchment-of-the-workman-must-be-proved-to-gain-the-right-re-employment-under-25h-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Retrenchment of the Workman must be proved to gain the right re-employment under 25(H) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":84,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=439"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8027,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/439\/revisions\/8027"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}