{"id":470,"date":"2020-04-23T10:29:54","date_gmt":"2020-04-23T10:29:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=470"},"modified":"2021-01-07T05:21:32","modified_gmt":"2021-01-07T05:21:32","slug":"merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/","title":{"rendered":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Harshit Sharma | Amity Law School, Madhya Pradesh | 7th January 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_47_1 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"ez-toc-toggle-icon-1\"><label for=\"item-6a2261e369d90\" aria-label=\"Table of Content\"><span style=\"display: flex;align-items: center;width: 35px;height: 30px;justify-content: center;direction:ltr;\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/label><input  type=\"checkbox\" id=\"item-6a2261e369d90\"><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#Surinder_Kumar_v_State_of_Punjab_CRIMINAL_APPEAL_NO_512_OF_2009\" title=\"Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009\">Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#FACTS_OF_THE_CASE\" title=\"FACTS OF THE CASE\">FACTS OF THE CASE<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#ISSUES_RAISED\" title=\"ISSUES RAISED\">ISSUES RAISED<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#RULING_OF_THE_COURT_THE_COURT_HELD_THAT\" title=\"RULING OF THE COURT\/ THE COURT HELD THAT\">RULING OF THE COURT\/ THE COURT HELD THAT<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Surinder_Kumar_v_State_of_Punjab_CRIMINAL_APPEAL_NO_512_OF_2009\"><\/span><em>Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009<\/em><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FACTS_OF_THE_CASE\"><\/span><strong>FACTS OF THE CASE<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Per the prosecution case, when the police were at patrolling, they saw the appellant accused coming from the opposite direction to that of the officials carrying a bag. On seeing the police officials, he turned towards the Southern bank of the canal, but was apprehended on suspicion.<\/li><li>The search of the bag resulted into recovery of 1 kg 750 grams of opium. Upon seizure, 2 samples of the 10 grams each were separated and were duly sealed and taken into possession.&nbsp;<\/li><li>On appearance in the court, the documents relied upon by the prosecution were supplied to the accused. A charge under Section 18 of the Act was framed against him, to which he pleaded not guilty and claimed trial.<\/li><li>The special judge, Ferozepur convicted the appellant-accused to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 10 years and to pay a fine of \u20b91,00,000\/- (Rupees One Lakh) in default of payment of the same, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for another period of one year.&nbsp;<\/li><li>The same was upheld by the Punjab &amp; Haryana High Court vide its order dated 22.04.2008, which is impugned in the present appeal before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court of India.<\/li><li>The main contention on which the appeal is preferred is that, the independent witnesses in the present case were not examined &amp; the conviction was based solely on the testimony of the official witnesses, which makes the case fatal and also that S.K. Asthana, ASP who is claimed to have joined to the party by the police, was not even examined and in fact he was not there and opium was not recovered in his presence.<\/li><li>Furthermore, there was no violation of Section-50 of the NDPS Act 1985.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"ISSUES_RAISED\"><\/span><strong>ISSUES RAISED<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Whether the non-examination of independent witnesses will hamper the justice delivery system and vitiate the trial on basis of the same?&nbsp;<\/li><li>Whether the conviction which is based solely on the examination of official witnesses be set-aside on this ground itself?&nbsp;<\/li><li>What is the applicability of the Mohan Lal Case Judgment (IO\/Informant same) in the present case?&nbsp;<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RULING_OF_THE_COURT_THE_COURT_HELD_THAT\"><\/span><strong>RULING OF THE COURT\/ THE COURT HELD THAT<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court upheld the conviction and were in agreement with the findings of the Ld. Trial Court while dismissing the appeal and observed the following:&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>\u201cSince Joginder Singh, ASI was not in possession of the seals of either of the SHO or of the Investigating Officer, the question of tampering with the case property by him did not arise at all.\u201d<\/li><li>\u201cIn that view of the matter, the Trial Court and the High Court have rightly held that non-examination of Joginder Singh, did not, in any way, affect the case of prosecution. Further, it is evident from the report of the Chemical Examiner, Ex. P-10, that the sample was received with seals intact and that the seals on the sample, tallied with the sample seals. In that view of the matter, the chain of evidence was complete.\u201d<\/li><li>\u201cAs much as S.K. Asthana, ASP was not examined by 30.04.1999, a request for an extension was sought by the Special Judge, Ferozepur and it was adjourned to 17.05.1999. Even by 17.05.1999, the ASP could not be served as he was on leave. In view of such reasoning assigned by the Trial Court, as well as the High Court, merely because S.K. Asthana, ASP was not examined, it cannot be said that prosecution has failed to prove its case. It is clear from the evidence on record that he was summoned at the time of search and seizure and only in his presence search was conducted, as such, there is no violation of Section 50 of the NDPS Act.\u201d<\/li><li>\u201cIt is to be noticed from the depositions of Devi Lal, Head Constable (PW-1), during the course of cross examination, has stated that efforts were made to join independent witnesses, but none were available. merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated. The evidence of official witnesses cannot be distrusted and disbelieved, merely on account of their official status.\u201d<\/li><li>\u201cIn the case of&nbsp;<strong>Varinder Kumar<\/strong>&nbsp;this Court held that all pending criminal prosecutions, trials and appeals prior to law laid down in&nbsp;<strong>Mohan Lal<\/strong>, shall continue to be governed by individual facts of the case.\u201d&nbsp;<\/li><\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Harshit Sharma | Amity Law School, Madhya Pradesh | 7th January 2020 Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009 FACTS OF THE CASE Per the prosecution case, when the police were at patrolling, they saw the appellant accused coming from the opposite direction to that of the officials carrying a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":144,"featured_media":373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Harshit Sharma | Amity Law School, Madhya Pradesh | 7th January 2020 Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009 FACTS OF THE CASE Per the prosecution case, when the police were at patrolling, they saw the appellant accused coming from the opposite direction to that of the officials carrying a [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harshit.sharma.1048\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"315\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Hshits1997\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Hshits1997\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Hshits1997\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/da5b12bcf24f10dd6314543ccd840355\"},\"headline\":\"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\"},\"wordCount\":760,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court Judgement\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\",\"name\":\"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/da5b12bcf24f10dd6314543ccd840355\",\"name\":\"Hshits1997\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"Hshits1997\"},\"description\":\"Harshit Sharma Advocate is a practising lawyer at the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior. He started his litigation practice before the Hon\u2019ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh since August, 2020 after being enrolled with the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh at enrolment number MP\/1228\/2020. Mr. Sharma hails from a generous and morally-valued driven family. He is the second-generation lawyer in his family who has taken up the task of stepping on the foot-steps of his father and the leading criminal advocate of the Gwalior Bar Sh. Vijay Dutt Sharma, Advocate. He always valued to strike a balance between education and moral-values which he quotes to have been a reflection of his mother Smt. Kusum Sharma and possibly this magical combination of the intellectual father and caring mother sailed him through to take the beautiful and successful academic leap, in both school as well as University. To quote the glorious academic years of Mr. Sharma, it all started with he been awarded with the Soli Sorabjee Award, which is bestowed upon the Legal Studies Topper of Class-XI (CBSE) of Gwalior Glory High School, Gwalior (M.P.). Since then, it has been the blessings of his parents, sister, teachers and family members that he completed his five-year integrated law course in B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) from Amity Law School, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior with flying colours and been the over-all topper of the course since its inception to its culmination. Mr. Sharma also had in his names to attend various national and international seminars on growing issues in the field of law and throughout his college life, he has been an active member of the Moot Court Committee and in the culminating years of his college life, he has also served as the Chairperson of the Moot Court Committee of Amity Law School, Amity University Madhya Pradesh. His experience owed from his association with top-notched institutions of the country and law offices, including National Human Rights Commission, National Judicial Academy Bhopal, Chambers of Sh. Sanjay Gupta Ji Advocate (Gwalior, M.P.), Sh. Deepak Vasant Rao Khot Ji Advocate (Gwalior, M.P.), Sh. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi Ji Advocate (A-O-R Supreme Court of India), Sh. Vaibhav Shrivastava Ji (Office of Sh. Vivek Tankha Ji Senior Advocate), Sh. Prashant Vaxish Advocate (Supreme Court of India) to name a few. Apart from being an avid learner and through-out student of Law, Mr. Sharma has under his name various research papers and articles published in National as well as International Journals and UGC-Approved Journals, pan India. More so, he is a constant content writer for various online blogs including the LatestLaws.com, Lawyers Club India, Legal Services India, Advocates Pedia Foundation, etc. In addition to his academic excellence, he is green-belt holder in karate and has been a district-level Judo and Table-Tennis Player for his School Team. He is fond of reading books and to pen poetries in both, English as well as Hindi language is his best hobby to spare time with.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harshit.sharma.1048\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/hshits1997\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti","og_description":"Harshit Sharma | Amity Law School, Madhya Pradesh | 7th January 2020 Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 512 OF 2009 FACTS OF THE CASE Per the prosecution case, when the police were at patrolling, they saw the appellant accused coming from the opposite direction to that of the officials carrying a [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harshit.sharma.1048","article_published_time":"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":560,"height":315,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Hshits1997","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Hshits1997","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/"},"author":{"name":"Hshits1997","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/da5b12bcf24f10dd6314543ccd840355"},"headline":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated","datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/"},"wordCount":760,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court Judgement"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/","name":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:29:54+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-07T05:21:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/merely-because-prosecution-did-not-examine-any-independent-witness-would-not-necessarily-lead-to-conclusion-that-accused-was-falsely-implicated\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Merely because prosecution did not examine any independent witness, would not necessarily lead to conclusion that accused was falsely implicated"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/da5b12bcf24f10dd6314543ccd840355","name":"Hshits1997","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"Hshits1997"},"description":"Harshit Sharma Advocate is a practising lawyer at the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Bench at Gwalior. He started his litigation practice before the Hon\u2019ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh since August, 2020 after being enrolled with the State Bar Council of Madhya Pradesh at enrolment number MP\/1228\/2020. Mr. Sharma hails from a generous and morally-valued driven family. He is the second-generation lawyer in his family who has taken up the task of stepping on the foot-steps of his father and the leading criminal advocate of the Gwalior Bar Sh. Vijay Dutt Sharma, Advocate. He always valued to strike a balance between education and moral-values which he quotes to have been a reflection of his mother Smt. Kusum Sharma and possibly this magical combination of the intellectual father and caring mother sailed him through to take the beautiful and successful academic leap, in both school as well as University. To quote the glorious academic years of Mr. Sharma, it all started with he been awarded with the Soli Sorabjee Award, which is bestowed upon the Legal Studies Topper of Class-XI (CBSE) of Gwalior Glory High School, Gwalior (M.P.). Since then, it has been the blessings of his parents, sister, teachers and family members that he completed his five-year integrated law course in B.A., LL.B. (Hons.) from Amity Law School, Amity University Madhya Pradesh, Gwalior with flying colours and been the over-all topper of the course since its inception to its culmination. Mr. Sharma also had in his names to attend various national and international seminars on growing issues in the field of law and throughout his college life, he has been an active member of the Moot Court Committee and in the culminating years of his college life, he has also served as the Chairperson of the Moot Court Committee of Amity Law School, Amity University Madhya Pradesh. His experience owed from his association with top-notched institutions of the country and law offices, including National Human Rights Commission, National Judicial Academy Bhopal, Chambers of Sh. Sanjay Gupta Ji Advocate (Gwalior, M.P.), Sh. Deepak Vasant Rao Khot Ji Advocate (Gwalior, M.P.), Sh. Fuzail Ahmad Ayyubi Ji Advocate (A-O-R Supreme Court of India), Sh. Vaibhav Shrivastava Ji (Office of Sh. Vivek Tankha Ji Senior Advocate), Sh. Prashant Vaxish Advocate (Supreme Court of India) to name a few. Apart from being an avid learner and through-out student of Law, Mr. Sharma has under his name various research papers and articles published in National as well as International Journals and UGC-Approved Journals, pan India. More so, he is a constant content writer for various online blogs including the LatestLaws.com, Lawyers Club India, Legal Services India, Advocates Pedia Foundation, etc. In addition to his academic excellence, he is green-belt holder in karate and has been a district-level Judo and Table-Tennis Player for his School Team. He is fond of reading books and to pen poetries in both, English as well as Hindi language is his best hobby to spare time with.","sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/harshit.sharma.1048"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/hshits1997\/"}]}},"views":92,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/144"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=470"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6965,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/470\/revisions\/6965"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=470"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=470"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=470"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}