{"id":5079,"date":"2020-09-16T17:52:57","date_gmt":"2020-09-16T17:52:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=5079"},"modified":"2021-01-17T05:25:59","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T05:25:59","slug":"supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Sabareesh Pillay | School of Law, University of Mumbai Thane Sub-Campus | 16th September 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_47_1 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"ez-toc-toggle-icon-1\"><label for=\"item-6a224a273e0ee\" aria-label=\"Table of Content\"><span style=\"display: flex;align-items: center;width: 35px;height: 30px;justify-content: center;direction:ltr;\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/label><input  type=\"checkbox\" id=\"item-6a224a273e0ee\"><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#Sunil_Samdaria_Vs_Union_Of_India_Ministry_Of_Law_And_Justice_And_Others\" title=\"Sunil Samdaria Vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Law And Justice And Others\">Sunil Samdaria Vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Law And Justice And Others<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#FACTS\" title=\"FACTS:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;\">FACTS:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#ISSUE\" title=\"ISSUE:\">ISSUE:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#PETITIONER_CONTENTION\" title=\"PETITIONER CONTENTION:\">PETITIONER CONTENTION:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#RESPONDENT_CONTENTION\" title=\"RESPONDENT CONTENTION:\">RESPONDENT CONTENTION:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#OBSERVATION_BY_THE_COURT\" title=\"OBSERVATION BY THE COURT:\">OBSERVATION BY THE COURT:<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-7\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#JUDGEMENT\" title=\"JUDGEMENT:\">JUDGEMENT:<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Sunil_Samdaria_Vs_Union_Of_India_Ministry_Of_Law_And_Justice_And_Others\"><\/span><strong>Sunil Samdaria Vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Law And Justice And Others<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FACTS\"><\/span><strong>FACTS:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In this case, two judges retired after turning 60, they were judges in the district court of Rajasthan. After their retirement, the state government issued a notification that the two judges will be appointed as additional judges in the High Court of Rajasthan. The petitioner Sunil Samdaria, a practicing advocate in the High Court of Rajasthan filed a petition against the appointment of the two retired district judges as the two judges didn\u2019t hold the judicial office anymore and thus they were not eligible to be appointed to hold a judicial office which is an eligibility criterion for being appointed as additional judges in the High Court according to the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"ISSUE\"><\/span><strong>ISSUE:<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>Whether to hold the position of an additional judge in the high court it is necessary to hold a judicial office?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"PETITIONER_CONTENTION\"><\/span><strong>PETITIONER CONTENTION:<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The petitioner, a practicing advocate in the high court of Rajasthan contended that the appointment should be taken back by the state government as under the constitution of India the two judges do not meet the eligibility requirements that is required. As it is defined in the constitution that judicial office means that a position that is a part of the judicial services, and as the two judges fulfill none of the criteria, their appointment should not be accepted and it should be declared as null and void.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RESPONDENT_CONTENTION\"><\/span><strong>RESPONDENT CONTENTION:<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The respondent contended that their appointment has been done in view with Article 224 of the Indian Constitution under which the maximum period for the appointment is specified clearly. Hence, it is neither null nor void as alleged by the petitioner. Secondly the respondent mentioned that the claims made by the petitioner are false as both the appointed judges had held the positions of judicial officers for more than 10 years and hence they are very much entitled to be the additional judges in the High Court of Rajasthan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"OBSERVATION_BY_THE_COURT\"><\/span><strong>OBSERVATION BY THE COURT:<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The bench comprising of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice A.K Sikri acknowledged the fact that the two judges had held judicial office for a period of 10 years and dismissed the claims made by the petitioner regarding this. When the petitioner implied that they had held the position and were not holding any currently so they are not eligible. The bench said that \u201cThe word \u2018held\u2019 which is used in the above section doesn\u2019t show that eligibility is likewise implied that besides holding 10 years a legal office, the officeholder ought to likewise be holding the judicial office at the time when under Article 224 notification was is given.\u201d&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"JUDGEMENT\"><\/span><strong>JUDGEMENT:<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court and to cope with this burden, it was necessary that the two judges be appointed. The court dismissed the petition by the advocate petitioner and both the judges were appointed as additional judges in the High Court of Rajasthan.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sabareesh Pillay | School of Law, University of Mumbai Thane Sub-Campus | 16th September 2020 Sunil Samdaria Vs Union Of India, Ministry Of Law And Justice And Others FACTS:&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In this case, two judges retired after turning 60, they were judges in the district court of Rajasthan. After their retirement, the state government issued a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":3630,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[101,26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/supreme-court_reuters-removebg-preview.png?fit=645%2C387&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"645\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"387\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\"},\"wordCount\":551,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Constitutional Law\",\"Supreme Court Judgement\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00\",\"description\":\"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti","description":"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti","og_description":"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":645,"height":387,"url":"https:\/\/i1.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/07\/supreme-court_reuters-removebg-preview.png?fit=645%2C387&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan","datePublished":"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/"},"wordCount":551,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Constitutional Law","Supreme Court Judgement"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/","name":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-09-16T17:52:57+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T05:25:59+00:00","description":"The court gave the judgment that there was an urgent need to appoint additional judges in the high court as there was a huge burden of cases in the Rajasthan High court","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court dismisses petition which questioned the appointment of 2 retired judges as additional judges in high court of Rajasthan"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":87,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5079"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5079"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5079\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7375,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5079\/revisions\/7375"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3630"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5079"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5079"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5079"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}