{"id":561,"date":"2020-04-23T10:30:00","date_gmt":"2020-04-23T10:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=561"},"modified":"2021-01-17T11:46:51","modified_gmt":"2021-01-17T11:46:51","slug":"failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/","title":{"rendered":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Rabia Basaria | Panjab University, Chandigarh | 3rd February 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"ez-toc-container\" class=\"ez-toc-v2_0_47_1 counter-hierarchy ez-toc-counter ez-toc-grey ez-toc-container-direction\">\n<div class=\"ez-toc-title-container\">\n<p class=\"ez-toc-title\">Table of Contents<\/p>\n<span class=\"ez-toc-title-toggle\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"ez-toc-pull-right ez-toc-btn ez-toc-btn-xs ez-toc-btn-default ez-toc-toggle\" aria-label=\"ez-toc-toggle-icon-1\"><label for=\"item-6a2261cd96310\" aria-label=\"Table of Content\"><span style=\"display: flex;align-items: center;width: 35px;height: 30px;justify-content: center;direction:ltr;\"><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" class=\"list-377408\" width=\"20px\" height=\"20px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" fill=\"none\"><path d=\"M6 6H4v2h2V6zm14 0H8v2h12V6zM4 11h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2zM4 16h2v2H4v-2zm16 0H8v2h12v-2z\" fill=\"currentColor\"><\/path><\/svg><svg style=\"fill: #999;color:#999\" class=\"arrow-unsorted-368013\" xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" width=\"10px\" height=\"10px\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" version=\"1.2\" baseProfile=\"tiny\"><path d=\"M18.2 9.3l-6.2-6.3-6.2 6.3c-.2.2-.3.4-.3.7s.1.5.3.7c.2.2.4.3.7.3h11c.3 0 .5-.1.7-.3.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7zM5.8 14.7l6.2 6.3 6.2-6.3c.2-.2.3-.5.3-.7s-.1-.5-.3-.7c-.2-.2-.4-.3-.7-.3h-11c-.3 0-.5.1-.7.3-.2.2-.3.5-.3.7s.1.5.3.7z\"\/><\/svg><\/span><\/label><input  type=\"checkbox\" id=\"item-6a2261cd96310\"><\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<nav><ul class='ez-toc-list ez-toc-list-level-1 ' ><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-1\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#Vijay_Panday_Vs_State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_Criminal_Appeal_No_1143_of_2019\" title=\"Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019\">Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-2\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#Matter\" title=\"Matter:-\">Matter:-<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-3\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#FACTS\" title=\"FACTS:-\u00a0\">FACTS:-\u00a0<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-4\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#APPELLANT%E2%80%99S_CONTENTION\" title=\"APPELLANT&#8217;S\u00a0CONTENTION:-\">APPELLANT&#8217;S\u00a0CONTENTION:-<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-5\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#RESPONDENT%E2%80%99S_CONTENTION\" title=\"RESPONDENT\u2019S CONTENTION:-\">RESPONDENT\u2019S CONTENTION:-<\/a><\/li><li class='ez-toc-page-1 ez-toc-heading-level-4'><a class=\"ez-toc-link ez-toc-heading-6\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#HELD\" title=\"HELD:-\">HELD:-<\/a><\/li><\/ul><\/nav><\/div>\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Vijay_Panday_Vs_State_of_Uttar_Pradesh_Criminal_Appeal_No_1143_of_2019\"><\/span><strong>Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"Matter\"><\/span><strong>Matter:-<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The appellant was charged u\/s 8 and 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [The NDPS Act] for 15 Years along with fine of Rs 5000 u\/s 31 of the NDPS Act.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"FACTS\"><\/span><strong>FACTS:-\u00a0<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>The appellant was arrested as he stepped out of his house.\u00a0<\/li><li>The appellant\u00a0is stated to have been\u00a0carrying a plastic flour packet in his right hand,leading to recovery of 10 kg of opium.\u00a0<\/li><li>There is no independent witness\u00a0from the locality included in the investigation.<\/li><li>All the witnesses\u00a0are\u00a0police officials only.\u00a0<\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"APPELLANT%E2%80%99S_CONTENTION\"><\/span><strong>A<\/strong><strong>PPELLANT&#8217;S<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><strong>CONTENTION<\/strong><strong>:-<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>It is contended that\u00a0it&#8217;s a\u00a0false allegation. Appellant is arrested\u00a0as he stepped out of his house.\u00a0There\u2019s no\u00a0explanation\u00a0for non availability of\u00a0independent. All the witnesses are police officials only\u00a0and also there\u2019s\u00a0non\u00a0compliance\u00a0with section 50 of the NDPS\u00a0Act. Further also prosecution failed to establish the sample produced in court was the same seized from\u00a0the\u00a0appellant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"RESPONDENT%E2%80%99S_CONTENTION\"><\/span>RESPONDENT\u2019S CONTENTION:-<span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>It is contended that appellant\u00a0has\u00a0previous history of\u00a0two\u00a0convictions\u00a0under the NDPC\u00a0Act.\u00a0Thesection 50 has been complied with. The\u00a0trail court was satisfied with the sample seized from the appellant.\u00a0In any\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><span class=\"ez-toc-section\" id=\"HELD\"><\/span><strong>HELD:-<\/strong><span class=\"ez-toc-section-end\"><\/span><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>The court found that seizure\u00a0was at the door step of the appellant and it is hard to believe that police were unable to find any independent witness. Further prosecutions failure to prove that seized sample was the same seized from the appellant\u00a0makes\u00a0the case no different from failure to produce the seized sample itself.\u00a0The court also stated that the fact of an earlier conviction may be relevant for the purpose of sentence but cannot be a ground for conviction per se.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Therefore the conviction by the\u00a0Trial\u00a0Court\u00a0and upheld by the\u00a0High\u00a0Court\u00a0are set aside and appellant is acquitted.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rabia Basaria | Panjab University, Chandigarh | 3rd February 2020 Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019 Matter:- The appellant was charged u\/s 8 and 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [The NDPS Act] for 15 Years along with fine of Rs 5000 u\/s 31 of the NDPS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":167,"featured_media":373,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[69,26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rabia Basaria | Panjab University, Chandigarh | 3rd February 2020 Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019 Matter:- The appellant was charged u\/s 8 and 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [The NDPS Act] for 15 Years along with fine of Rs 5000 u\/s 31 of the NDPS [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"560\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"315\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"LexForti Legal News Network\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\"},\"headline\":\"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\"},\"wordCount\":341,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Criminal Law\",\"Supreme Court Judgement\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\",\"name\":\"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png\",\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News Network\"},\"description\":\"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.\",\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\",\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti","og_description":"Rabia Basaria | Panjab University, Chandigarh | 3rd February 2020 Vijay Panday\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Vs.\u00a0\u00a0State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019 Matter:- The appellant was charged u\/s 8 and 15 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [The NDPS Act] for 15 Years along with fine of Rs 5000 u\/s 31 of the NDPS [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","article_published_time":"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":560,"height":315,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/04\/All-the-love-from-James-9.jpg?fit=560%2C315&ssl=1","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"LexForti Legal News Network","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"LexForti Legal News Network","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/"},"author":{"name":"LexForti Legal News Network","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88"},"headline":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF","datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/"},"wordCount":341,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Criminal Law","Supreme Court Judgement"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/","name":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2020-04-23T10:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2021-01-17T11:46:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/failure-to-prove-that-the-seized-sample-produce-was-the-same-seized-from-appellant-means-failure-to-produce-the-seized-sample-itself\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE PRODUCE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/dc82860cbb04dab62a7b0a28b0cabc88","name":"LexForti Legal News Network","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/159134300345793876-96x96.png","caption":"LexForti Legal News Network"},"description":"LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.","sameAs":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti","https:\/\/twitter.com\/https:\/\/twitter.com\/lex_forti","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/channel\/UCRT9bwtsiRtF-RYr4G2dv3w"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/lexforti-legal-news-network\/"}]}},"views":82,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/167"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=561"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7982,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/561\/revisions\/7982"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}