<\/span><\/h2>\n\n\n\nThe Doctrine of Natural Justice has been evolved and followed by the judiciary to protect the fundamental rights of people and to feature the concept of fairness by the administrative authorities. At every stage of the proceedings, the essentials and principles of natural justice are always kept in mind so as to prevent the miscarriage of justice and arbitrariness and to uphold fairness, reasonableness, good conscience, equity and equality. The doctrine of natural justice is so flexible in nature that it changes itself to an extent where the rights of an individual are infringed. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
If any judicial authority violates the principle of \u201cNemo judex in causa sua\u201d then the order passed would be voidable, i.e. it can be challenged by any court. But if any judicial authority violates the principle of \u201caudi alteram partem\u201d, then the order would be regarded as void ab initio. Thus, the adjudicating authority must have sufficient knowledge about the principles of natural justice i.e. \u201cnemo judex in causa sua\u201d and \u201caudi alteram partem\u201d before articulating any judgment. Hence, it should be concluded that-<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe universal and absolute law is that natural justice which cannot be written down, but which appeals to the hearts of all\u201d.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n