{"id":8481,"date":"2021-02-05T14:43:59","date_gmt":"2021-02-05T14:43:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?p=8481"},"modified":"2021-02-05T14:44:19","modified_gmt":"2021-02-05T14:44:19","slug":"supreme-court-litigant-recusal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The <a href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-dismisses-petition-which-questioned-the-appointment-of-2-retired-judges-as-additional-judges-in-high-court-of-rajasthan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Supreme Court dismissed a plea<\/a> filed for recusal of Justice DY Chandrachud on ground that a petitioner cannot choose a bench of his\/her choice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The petitioner sought for recusal of judge on ground that she might not get a favourable order.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The original case arose from a domestic violence complaint which dismissed by Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru. Later, the appeal was <a href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-must-not-interfere-with-the-dismissal-order-of-the-disciplinary-authority-which-is-based-on-the-inquiry\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">also dismissed<\/a> by Additional Sessions Judge. The revision petition at High Court was also dismissed after which the petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This writ petition was transferred to the Supreme Court where the division bench comprising of Justices DY Chandrachud and KM Joseph held that it is not maintainable, as an order passed by High Court, in exercise of its judicial powers, cannot be challenged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The petitioner then sought for a recall of the order and filed an application for the same.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>She appeared in person before the court and asked for recusal of Justice DY Chandrachud from hearing her petition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus <a href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/courts-must-not-interfere-with-the-dismissal-order-of-the-disciplinary-authority-which-is-based-on-the-inquiry-2\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dismissed her application<\/a> for the recall of the previous order.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court dismissed a plea filed for recusal of Justice DY Chandrachud on ground that a petitioner cannot choose a bench of his\/her choice. The petitioner sought for recusal of judge on ground that she might not get a favourable order. The original case arose from a domestic violence complaint which dismissed by Metropolitan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":170,"featured_media":8489,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1399,26],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v21.8.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"LexForti\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/chandrachud.jpg?fit=1280%2C675&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"675\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Shivangi Pandey\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Shivangi Pandey\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Shivangi Pandey\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/17648aa9759e1f4a693d29c558e836ee\"},\"headline\":\"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered\",\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\"},\"wordCount\":215,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"News\",\"Supreme Court Judgement\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\",\"name\":\"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00\",\"description\":\"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"name\":\"LexForti\",\"description\":\"Legal\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization\",\"name\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1\",\"width\":404,\"height\":404,\"caption\":\"LexForti Legal News & Journal\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/17648aa9759e1f4a693d29c558e836ee\",\"name\":\"Shivangi Pandey\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/shivangi.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/shivangi.jpg\",\"caption\":\"Shivangi Pandey\"},\"description\":\"I'm a news analyst at LexForti Legal News.\",\"sameAs\":[\"Shivangi Pandey\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/shivangi-pandey\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti","description":"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti","og_description":"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..","og_url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/","og_site_name":"LexForti","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","article_published_time":"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":675,"url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/chandrachud.jpg?fit=1280%2C675&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Shivangi Pandey","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Shivangi Pandey","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/"},"author":{"name":"Shivangi Pandey","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/17648aa9759e1f4a693d29c558e836ee"},"headline":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered","datePublished":"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/"},"wordCount":215,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"articleSection":["News","Supreme Court Judgement"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/","name":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered - LexForti","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-02-05T14:43:59+00:00","dateModified":"2021-02-05T14:44:19+00:00","description":"Justice Shah observed that recusal would not be allowed as it is not based on reasonable grounds, and thus dismissed her application for the..","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/supreme-court-litigant-recusal\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Supreme Court- Litigant not permitted to seek recusal of a Judge on the ground that unsatisfactory order might be delivered"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#website","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","name":"LexForti","description":"Legal","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#organization","name":"LexForti Legal News & Journal","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i2.wp.com\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/159134300345793876.png?fit=404%2C404&ssl=1","width":404,"height":404,"caption":"LexForti Legal News & Journal"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/lexforti\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/lex-forti\/"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/17648aa9759e1f4a693d29c558e836ee","name":"Shivangi Pandey","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/shivangi.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/shivangi.jpg","caption":"Shivangi Pandey"},"description":"I'm a news analyst at LexForti Legal News.","sameAs":["Shivangi Pandey"],"url":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/author\/shivangi-pandey\/"}]}},"views":70,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8481"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/170"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8481"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8481\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8491,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8481\/revisions\/8491"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8489"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lexforti.com\/legal-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}