Posts By :

Vaishnavi Nirmal

Criminal Law

A judgment is an authority for what it decides, the ratio and not for what may logically follow from the decision
Vaishnavi Nirmal
1

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 10th March 2020  Manohar Lal Sharma vs. Narendra Damodardas Modi and others WP (Crl.) 225/2018; RP (Crl.) 46/2019 Fact of…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
All the love from James-3|All the love from James-2|All the love from James-2
Civil Law Constitutional Law Law relating to Religion

This Court as the final arbiter must preserve the sense of balance that the beliefs of one citizen do not interfere with or dominate the freedoms and beliefs of another
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 10th March 2020 M Siddiq (D) Thr Lrs vs Mahant Suresh Das & Ors Civil Appeal Nos 10866-10867 of 2010…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

The only drawback the dissent suffers from is the apparent physical impracticality of stalling the work at such a late juncture and the seemingly last-minute measure would be seen as antidevelopment
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 9th March 2020 Narmada Bachao Andolan vs Union of India and others AIR 2000 SC 3751 Fact of case: On behalf of…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Criminal Law

Supreme Court stands its ground in declaring communal violence purportedly in the name of a particular religion to not only be criminal but also religiously reprehensible
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 9th March 2020 Zahira Habibulla H Sheikh and Anr. Vs. State of Gujarat others Appeal (criminal) 446-449 of 2004 Fact of case:…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

Sexual intercourse with a wife below 18 years is a Criminal offence
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 26th February 2020  Independent Thought vs. Union of India Fact of case: The petitioner is a National Human Rights organization registered in 2009 and…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

Right to choose life partner is a fundamental right
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 26th February 2020 Shakti Vahini vs. Union of India & Others Fact of case: The Petitioner Shakti Vahini Organization was authorized for…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Civil Law

One of the hallmarks of the law is certainty, predictability and stability unless the ground reality has completely changed
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 2nd March 2020  Gujarat vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, 2005 Fact of case: By the Bombay Animal Preservation (Gujarat Amendment) Act…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

Reasonable discrimination between female and male for an object sought to be achieved is permissible because important limb of this concept of gender equality is creating job opportunities for women
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 2nd March 2020  Vijay Lakshmi vs. Punjab University and others, 2003 Appeal (Civil) 13393 of 1996 Fact of case: Preference given to…

read more
460 259 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Family Law Law relating to Religion Supreme Court Judgement

Marriage resulting from religious conversion to Islam for taking a second wife is void when his first marriage is still in existence under the Hindu Marriage Act.
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 24th February 2020 Lily Thomas vs. Union of India & Others., AIR 2000 SC 1650 Fact of case: Lily Thomas is the…

read more
460 259 Vaishnavi Nirmal
blog supreme court banner
Law relating to Religion Supreme Court Judgement

The State cannot insist on private educational institutions which receive no aid from the State to implement State’s policy on reservation for granting admission on any criterion except merit.
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 24th February 2020 P.A. Inamdar & Others v/s State of Maharashtra & Others., Case no.: Appeal (civil) 5041 of 2005 Fact of case: In…

read more
400 225 Vaishnavi Nirmal
blog supreme court banner
Supreme Court Judgement

The human rights of a daughter, brother, sister or son are not mortgaged to the so called honour of the family or the clan.
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 24th February 2020 State of U.P. v/s Krishna Master & Others., (Criminal Appeal No. 1180 of 2004) Fact of case: The incident in question…

read more
400 225 Vaishnavi Nirmal
blog supreme court banner
Supreme Court Judgement

The demon of ragging haunted the juniors and resulted in death of an innocent fresher student.
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal  | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 24th February 2020 UNIVERSITY OF KERALA Vs COUNCIL, PRINCIPALS' COLLEGES, KERALA &ORS., Fact of case: A Delhi Public School student who had taken admission…

read more
400 225 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Criminal Law Supreme Court Judgement

By Arbitrary decision, any innocent comment can just not be put in the ambit of Hate Speech and any hate speech cannot be given the shield of right to Speech and Expression
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 14th February 2020 Shreya Singhal v. Union of India Facts: In the year 2012, Shiv Sena leader Bal Thakerey died.…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Criminal Law

Equality in employment can be seriously impaired when women are subjected to gender specific violence
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 14th February 2020 Vishaka and others vs. State of Rajasthan and others Fact of case: Bhanwari Devi who was a…

read more
400 225 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Civil Law Supreme Court Judgement

Facets of privacy are to be classified into:- Non-interference with the individual’s body, Protection of personal information and Autonomy over personal choices
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 14th February 2020 Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Anr. Vs. Union of India(WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 494 OF 2012)…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

A democratic society is one that embraces tolerance, diversity and acceptance with open mindedness
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 8th February 2020 Naz Foundation v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Others(WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 7455 OF 2001) Facts:…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Uncategorized

Unanimous decision of Constitutional Bench paves why for “Right to die with dignity” by allowing passive euthanasia
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 14th February 2020 Common Cause & Anr. vs. Union of India Anr. Important Definition: Passive Euthanasia - The withdrawal of…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 4th February 2020

read more
150 150 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Civil Law Law relating to Religion Supreme Court Judgement

Patriarchy in religion cannot be allowed to trump right to pray and practice religion
Vaishnavi Nirmal
1

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 6th February 2020 Young Lawyer Association v. The State of Kerala (Sabarimala) (WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 373 OF 2006) Facts:…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Family Law Supreme Court Judgement

Impugned practice is a tool by which marital tie can be broken on whims of Husband without any attempt of reconciliation to save it
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Annasaheb Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 5th February 2020 Shayara Bano and others v. Union of India and Others. (Writ Petition (C) No. 118 of 2016)…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement

Judicial criticism must not be based on a gross misstatement and must not be directed at lowering the reputation of the judiciary
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 5th February 2020 Arundhati Roy v. Unknown Fact of case: This case concerns a suo-moto contempt petition against the Respondent, Arundhati…

read more
560 315 Vaishnavi Nirmal
Supreme Court Judgement
Vaishnavi Nirmal
0

Vaishnavi Nirmal | Manikchand Pahade Law College, Aurangabad | 4th February 2020

read more
150 150 Vaishnavi Nirmal
CLICK HERE TO VISIT