FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF

FAILURE TO PROVE THAT THE SEIZED SAMPLE WAS THE SAME SEIZED FROM APPELLANT MEANS FAILURE TO PRODUCE THE SEIZED SAMPLE ITSELF

Vijay Panday  Vs.  State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 1143 of 2019

150 150 LexForti Legal News Network
Share

Leave a Reply

Avatar

LexForti Legal News Network

LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.

All stories by : LexForti Legal News Network
Previous Post
Disability Pension can be granted under Golden Jubilee Seema Prahari Kalyan Kawach only in some cases
Next Post
Dying declaration alone cannot be treated as a valid evidence to punish the accused
About Author
Avatar

LexForti Legal News Network

LexForti Legal News and Journal offer access to a wide array of legal knowledge through the Daily Legal News segment of our Website. It provides the readers with the latest case laws in layman terms. Our Legal Journal contains a vast assortment of resources that helps in understanding contemporary legal issues.

Consult
Leave this field blank
SUBSCRIBE only if you like the content!
.