Rohit Pradhan | 19th November 2019
Ashok Kumar Kalra v. Wing CDR. Surendra Agnihotri & Ors., SLP (C) No. 23599 of 2018
Issue:
Whether language of Order VIII Rule 6A of the CPC is mandatory in nature?
Held:
Supreme Court held that, Order VIII Rule 6A CPC does not put blanket ban on filing of Counter-Claim after filing of Written Statement. Court do have discretion, through which it can permit the filing of a counter-claim after the written statement, till the stage of framing of the issues of the trial.
There is no absolute right to the defendant to file the counter-claim, when there is a substantive delay. Court will then exercise its discretion, as to if it should entertain counter-claim or not. Court will take into consideration following factors:
- Period of Delay
- Prescribed limitation period for the cause of action pleaded
- Reason for the delay
- Defendant’s assertion of his rights
- If there is any similarity between main or counter claim, w.r.t cause of action.
- If there is any abuse of process
- Facts/Circumstances of each cases
- In any case, not after framing of the issues.
It can’t be pleaded (Counter-claim) after framing of the issues in any case howsoever.
[wpdm_package id=’1811′]
Leave a Reply