Trademark registration is a necessity


Gomzi Active v. Reebok India Co & Anr. 2007 (34) PTC 161 (SC)


The appellant was of contention that the slogan “I am what I am” was being used by them since 1998 for selling their garments and they had copyright over them. They claimed that it was their trademark. The same was being used by the company Reebok and the appellants were against it. According g to them, the use of same slogan by both the companies will mislead the consumers and will detoriate the position and market value of them. 


  • Whether the use of slogan by Reebok an infringement of trademark or not?
  • Whether the use of slogan by defendant infringing the intellectual property rights of the appellant?


  • Section 2(1)(w), Trade Marks Act
  • Section 27(1), Trade Marks Act

Contention of Defendant:

The slogan used by the appellant was not registered under Government’s register as a trade mark and as per Section 2(1)(w), Trade Marks Act, till the slogan is not registered as a trade mark, copyright over it cannot be claimed.

According to Section 27(1) of the same act no none can institute a claim for recovery of damage for any trade mark unless it is registered in Trade marks register. 


The appeal was dismissed and no injunction was ordered to the defendant because the slogan was not registered under trademark register and until it is registered; it can be used by other parties too.

Reasoning of Judgement:

The appellant used the slogan for selling arguments whereas the defendant used it for other purpose so the customers cannot be deviated by the use of same slogan. Also, the defendant does not use it in a sense the appellant does. 


The judgement explains us the significance of getting the trademark registered. The trademark if not registered can be used by other companies too. This can be harmful for the company’s reputation and can also take away the uniqueness of the company’s products too. Therefore, its necessary to get it registered because without registration court will alos not take any action against any company.

More from author


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related posts

Latest posts

Waiver of Second Motion: Mandatory or Discretionary

Sejal Makkad | Amity Law School, Amity University Chhattisgarh | 29th May 2020 AMARDEEP SINGH V HARVEEN KAUR CIVIL...

J&K HC Upholds The Detention of HC Bar Association President Mian Abdul Qayoom

Ukkash F | Sastra School of Law, Tamil Nadu | 29th May 2020 Mian Abdul Qayoom v. Union Territory of...

Nobody has a right to rape a woman even if she is habitual to sexual intercourse

Ashutosh Rajput | Hidayatullah National Law University | 28th May 2020 State Govt. NCT Delhi v. Pankaj Chaudhary &...

Want to stay up to date with the latest news?

We would love to hear from you! Please fill in your details and we will stay in touch. It's that simple!